Curse

jomandoor · May 26, 2005, 11:34 PM // 23:34

sign here for one on one arenas..

Me

Tyrent Frath · May 26, 2005, 11:37 PM // 23:37

hmmmm, i like the idea

Me-Fyren Trath

Wizard Yingu · May 26, 2005, 11:42 PM // 23:42

Wizard Yingu

Bring on the eliteness

Signed.

PS.
Contact the offical forum and/or email them or something. Because this is the best idea in the forum!!! Having the possiblity of one vs one PvP fight is only going to make the game even more attactive than now.

kirab · May 26, 2005, 11:46 PM // 23:46

I'd definetely like to see this,

Signed,

kirab

Gauwyn Vorec · May 26, 2005, 11:58 PM // 23:58

I don't like the idea... seeing as how this game IS GUILD Wars, not "Individual Wars".

ZennZero · May 26, 2005, 11:59 PM // 23:59

If you don't like it, you wouldn't have to do it. I think adding the mode certainly couldn't hurt.

Gauwyn Vorec · May 27, 2005, 12:05 AM // 00:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZennZero

If you don't like it, you wouldn't have to do it. I think adding the mode certainly couldn't hurt.

True... but I still don't like it. It's against the entire purpose of the game. I can see adding a /duel feature... but not a competitive 1 vs 1 feature.

Also keep in mind that proposing ideas such as this... especially without specific details... you're bound to see some flak and those who sincerely just don't like it (like me).

jomandoor · May 27, 2005, 12:40 AM // 00:40

as it is said, if you dont like it. dont do it :P

I would love to duel one on one.

Prove that there are some good rangers out there.

Tavenlen · May 27, 2005, 01:10 AM // 01:10

I would be nice, but only if they didn't have a 1v1 ranking system. It undermines the whole idea of Guild Wars, as Gauwyn says.

Luggage · May 27, 2005, 01:13 AM // 01:13

Search and read the long long threads about why most people here are against this.

wgregory87 · May 27, 2005, 01:16 AM // 01:16

What do you mean the whole idea of the game is wars between guilds. Who cares what the game is called, 1v1 may be good anyways. Anyways you can't oppose this. If it were to be added it wouldn't affect you in any way and arguing against it just makes you look like an idiot. The game is called guild wars because they have recognized guilds and have incorporated them nicely, it doesn't mean the whole game should revolve around battles between guilds.

This is coming from someone who wouldn't do 1v1 duels in the first place.

Jackell · May 27, 2005, 01:29 AM // 01:29

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...ighlight=duels

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...ighlight=duels

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...ighlight=duels

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...ighlight=duels

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...ighlight=duels

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...ighlight=duels

eA-Zaku · May 27, 2005, 01:47 AM // 01:47

Adding in a feature that doesn't fit in the first place may not affect those who dislike it, but it will severely drain ArenaNet's $ and that may mean that Guild Wars will shut down/shut down sooner. I'd rather have no duels and play longer than have a duel option that I wouldn't use and have the Guild Wars servers go offline from lack of funding.

ICURADik · May 27, 2005, 02:36 AM // 02:36

No one could ever beat a monk.. but a monk would have a tough time killing hardly anyone. It would just lead to horribly long boring matches, with the winner being the one that can stay awake longer.

Wind · May 27, 2005, 04:05 AM // 04:05

I would like to see this where, you wouldn't be thrown in randomly, but you could battle against a friend. To see who is better.

nostra · May 27, 2005, 06:46 AM // 06:46

I'm for this option.

nostra

JjK · May 27, 2005, 06:50 AM // 06:50

Vote yes on 121532

Amigo · May 27, 2005, 06:51 AM // 06:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by ICURADik

No one could ever beat a monk.. but a monk would have a tough time killing hardly anyone. It would just lead to horribly long boring matches, with the winner being the one that can stay awake longer.

U know what a mesmer are?

i think its a good idea...

ICURADik · May 27, 2005, 08:43 AM // 08:43

So explain how a mesmer does damage? As long as the monk just keeps breeze on there isnt much in the way of attacks a mesmer primary can do. Maybe if you are war/ranger/ele with a mesmer secondary you would have a shot. It is still nearly impossible to out damage a healing specced monk. I'm not saying this should be changed... Healers are supposed to heal for more than what is possible to deal in damage to balance out groups. Otherwise.. everyone wouldn't even have a monk because your just delaying the inevitable death and losing a damage dealing slot.

Siren · May 27, 2005, 09:16 AM // 09:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by ICURADik

So explain how a mesmer does damage? As long as the monk just keeps breeze on there isnt much in the way of attacks a mesmer primary can do. Maybe if you are war/ranger/ele with a mesmer secondary you would have a shot. It is still nearly impossible to out damage a healing specced monk. I'm not saying this should be changed... Healers are supposed to heal for more than what is possible to deal in damage to balance out groups. Otherwise.. everyone wouldn't even have a monk because your just delaying the inevitable death and losing a damage dealing slot.

They do damage indirectly (and sometimes directly). Power Leak, Power Spike, Arcane Conundrum, Backfire, Migraine, Chaos Storm...I'm pretty exhausted right now, but a properly played Mesmer can certainly destroy a Monk, even a healing specced one.